KZN ANC will answer to leadership court case — after the election

The applicants had asked the court to declare unlawful and set aside decisions‚ resolutions and elections made at the conference‚ and declare invalid recognition of the conference by the ANC.

[et_pb_section admin_label=”section” transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” custom_padding=”19px|3px|36px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”18.8906px|0px|0px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off” border_color=”#ffffff”]

The applicants had asked the court to declare unlawful and set aside decisions‚ resolutions and elections made at the conference‚ and declare invalid recognition of the conference by the ANC.

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row admin_label=”row” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”18px|0px|18px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″][et_pb_text admin_label=”Text” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off” border_color=”#ffffff”]

The ANC KwaZulu-Natal does not know the motive behind court action to nullify its leadership just days before the local government election.

It knew a court application was brought on Friday to scrap the ANC’s eighth provincial elective conference results‚ a move which could oust the provincial leadership, secretary Super Zuma said on Wednesday.

In that conference, Sihle Zikalala beat former Premier Senzo Mchunu to become the provincial chairperson. Afterwards, Mchunu sympathisers twice marched to provincial ANC headquarters demanding the conference be rerun. They claimed that the new leadership intended to fire Mchunu and several of his MECs from the executive council. Four MEC’s were axed a fortnight after Mchunu announced in May that he had resigned as premier at the ANC KwaZulu-Natal’s leadership’s behest.

The recent court application was brought by Lawrence Dube‚ Sibahle Zikalala‚ Martin Mzangwa‚ Mzweni Ngcobo and Lindiwe Buthelezi.

“At this stage‚ we don’t know why they left this so late‚ especially with the election so close. They had plenty of time to do so because the conference happened in November. But we don’t have a problem with the application. We will answer to it,” said Zuma.

He said the ANC KwaZulu-Natal would not call a special meeting to discuss the court application.

“We don’t want anything to make us lose focus. We are focussed on elections. We can deal with this application afterwards‚” he said.

News24 on Wednesday reported that a notice of motion was filed in the Pietermaritzburg High Court dated July 22.

The applicants had asked the court to declare unlawful and set aside decisions‚ resolutions and elections made at the conference‚ and declare invalid recognition of the conference by the ANC.

The 39 respondents, including Sihle Zikalala‚ his deputy Willies Mchunu‚ the ANC‚ and the Electoral Institute of Southern Africa (Eisa), have until September to file responding papers.

KwaZulu-Natal Electoral Commission of SA (IEC) spokesman Thabani Ngwira said the suit would not affect the local government election next Wednesday.

“This is an internal matter and the election will go on as normal‚ unless the IEC is a respondent in the matter‚” Ngwira said.

 

-Source: TMG Digital/ BusinessDay- Written by NIVASHNI NAIR AND NOMPUMELELO MAGWAZA

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_blurb admin_label=”Blurb” title=”View article source” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”on” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#bf3c00″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#00a323″ use_circle_border=”off” circle_border_color=”#00a323″ icon_placement=”top” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” use_icon_font_size=”off” icon_font_size=”36px” header_font_size=”22px” body_font=”Droid Sans||||” body_font_size=”14px” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

[/et_pb_blurb][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

The Applicants

The Applicants in the KZN 2016 ANC Court Action

[et_pb_section transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” admin_label=”section” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_blurb title=”LAWRENCE DUBE” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”off” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#996300″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#61688f” use_circle_border=”on” circle_border_color=”#61688f” image=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/icon_person_by_ninjavdesign-d8x96sl1.png” icon_placement=”top” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” max_width=”150px” use_icon_font_size=”off” header_line_height=”1.2em” header_text_color=”#cca60e”]

Chairperson of Beyers Naude branch
Ward 22 of the Vryheid SubRegion, Abaqulusl Region of the ANC in KZN. I am the First Applicant in this matter.

[/et_pb_blurb][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”18.3333px|0px|18.3333px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on”][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_blurb title=”Sibahle Zikalala” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”off” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#996300″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#61688f” use_circle_border=”on” circle_border_color=”#61688f” image=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/icon_person_by_ninjavdesign-d8x96sl1.png” icon_placement=”top” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” max_width=”150px” use_icon_font_size=”off” header_line_height=”1.2em” header_text_color=”#cca60e”]

Secretary of the Nzalabantu branch
Ward 5,
Mbonambi Sub-Region of Musa Dladla Region) of the KwaZulu-Natal ANC. 

[/et_pb_blurb][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_blurb title=”Martin Sifiso Mzangwa” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”off” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#996300″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#61688f” use_circle_border=”on” circle_border_color=”#61688f” image=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/icon_person_by_ninjavdesign-d8x96sl1.png” icon_placement=”top” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” max_width=”150px” use_icon_font_size=”off” header_line_height=”1.2em” header_text_color=”#cca60e”]

Secretary of the Somkhele branch
Ward 18,
Mtubatuba Sub-Region of the Far North Region of the KwaZulu-Natal ANC.

[/et_pb_blurb][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”18.3333px|0px|18.3333px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on”][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_blurb title=”Mzweni Remigius Ngcobo” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”off” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#996300″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#61688f” use_circle_border=”on” circle_border_color=”#61688f” image=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/icon_person_by_ninjavdesign-d8x96sl1.png” icon_placement=”top” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” max_width=”150px” use_icon_font_size=”off” header_line_height=”1.2em” header_text_color=”#cca60e”]

Chairman of Ward 57
eThekwini Region of the KwaZulu-Natal ANC.

[/et_pb_blurb][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_blurb title=”Lindiwe Nomalungelo Buthelezi” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”off” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#996300″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#61688f” use_circle_border=”on” circle_border_color=”#61688f” image=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/icon_person_by_ninjavdesign-d8x96sl1.png” icon_placement=”top” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” max_width=”150px” use_icon_font_size=”off” header_line_height=”1.2em” header_text_color=”#cca60e”]

Branch Secretary of the Prince Magasa branch
Ward 8, Nongoma Sub-Region, Abaqulusi Region) of the KwaZulu-Natal ANC.

[/et_pb_blurb][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Court Case 2016

[et_pb_section transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” custom_padding=”37.9167px|0px|37.9167px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” admin_label=”section” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_blurb title=”Correspondence” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”on” font_icon=”w” icon_color=”#e09900″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#61688f” use_circle_border=”off” circle_border_color=”#61688f” icon_placement=”left” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” use_icon_font_size=”on” icon_font_size=”53px” admin_label=”Blurb” header_font=”Montserrat|on|||” header_font_size=”32px” header_text_color=”#4a5282″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

[/et_pb_blurb][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”||0px|” custom_padding=”||0px|” disabled=”off”]

12 September 2016

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_divider color=”#ffffff” show_divider=”on” hide_on_mobile=”on”][/et_pb_divider][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”||0px|” custom_padding=”||0px|” disabled=”off”]

Letter from Respondent’s Attorneys

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/pdfdownload-button-1-1.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/LawyerLetter20160912.pdf” url_new_window=”on” use_overlay=”off” sticky=”on” align=”left” max_width=”200px” force_fullwidth=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” admin_label=”Image” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

[/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_image show_in_lightbox=”off” url_new_window=”off” use_overlay=”off” animation=”left” sticky=”off” align=”left” force_fullwidth=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on”][/et_pb_image][et_pb_social_media_follow link_shape=”rounded_rectangle” background_layout=”light” url_new_window=”on” follow_button=”on”][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”facebook” url=”#” skype_action=”call” bg_color=”#3b5998″ link_shape=”rounded_rectangle” follow_button=”on” url_new_window=”on”]facebook[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”twitter” url=”#” skype_action=”call” bg_color=”#00aced” link_shape=”rounded_rectangle” follow_button=”on” url_new_window=”on”]twitter[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”google-plus” url=”#” skype_action=”call” bg_color=”#dd4b39″ link_shape=”rounded_rectangle” follow_button=”on” url_new_window=”on”]google-plus[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”linkedin” url=”#” skype_action=”call” bg_color=”#007bb6″ link_shape=”rounded_rectangle” follow_button=”on” url_new_window=”on”]linkedin[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network social_network=”instagram” url=”#” skype_action=”call” bg_color=”#517fa4″ link_shape=”rounded_rectangle” follow_button=”on” url_new_window=”on”]instagram[/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][et_pb_social_media_follow_network url=”#” skype_action=”call” bg_color=”#61688f” link_shape=”rounded_rectangle” follow_button=”on” url_new_window=”on”][/et_pb_social_media_follow_network][/et_pb_social_media_follow][et_pb_cta title=”Please support us by sharing this page or making a donation toward our legal costs” url_new_window=”off” button_text=”Donate Now” use_background_color=”on” background_color=”#6f9360″ background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”center” header_font_size=”26px” custom_padding=”||0px|” custom_margin=”0px||0px|” body_font=”||||” header_font=”||||” custom_button=”on” button_text_size=”15px” button_border_width=”5px” button_use_icon=”off”][/et_pb_cta][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_blurb title=”The Application” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”on” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#e09900″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#61688f” use_circle_border=”off” circle_border_color=”#61688f” icon_placement=”left” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” use_icon_font_size=”on” icon_font_size=”53px” admin_label=”Blurb” header_font=”Montserrat|on|||” header_font_size=”32px” header_text_color=”#4a5282″ use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

[/et_pb_blurb][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”||0px|” custom_padding=”||0px|” disabled=”off”]

Background on the Case

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” custom_margin=”||0px|” custom_padding=”||0px|” disabled=”off”]

Case File including all annexures

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_image src=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/pdfdownload-button-1-1.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/KZN_Case.pdf” url_new_window=”on” use_overlay=”off” sticky=”on” align=”left” max_width=”200px” force_fullwidth=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” admin_label=”Image” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

[/et_pb_image][/et_pb_column][et_pb_column type=”1_2″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_signup provider=”mailchimp” title=”Join our mailing list to keep in touch and for the latest news & breaking developments in the case” button_text=”Subscribe” use_background_color=”on” background_color=”#46597f” background_layout=”dark” text_orientation=”left” use_focus_border_color=”off” custom_margin=”0px||0px|” header_text_color=”#ddcd94″ header_font_size=”24px” header_font=”Montserrat||||” body_line_height=”1.1em” header_line_height=”1.2em” header_letter_spacing=”0px” custom_padding=”|||” body_font_size=”9px”][/et_pb_signup][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_comments show_avatar=”on” show_reply=”on” show_count=”on” background_layout=”light” input_border_radius=”0px”][/et_pb_comments][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section][et_pb_section transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” admin_label=”section” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

KZN_Case

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

LawyerLetter20160912

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

African National Congress Constitution

ANC Constitution As amended and adopted by the 53rd National Conference Mangaung 2012AFRICAN

[et_pb_section transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” admin_label=”section” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_image src=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/pdfdownload-button-1-1.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/const.pdf” url_new_window=”on” use_overlay=”off” sticky=”on” align=”center” force_fullwidth=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” admin_label=”Image” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”] [/et_pb_image][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off” inline_fonts=”Roboto”]

Date of hearing: 20 November 2012 and 29 November 2012

On Tuesday 18 December 2012, the Constitutional Court gave reasons why, on 21 November 2012 it granted to leave to appeal against a judgment of the Free State High Court. The applicants, six members of the African National Congress (ANC) in the FreeState had asked the High Court, to declare invalid a meeting of the Free State Provincial Executive Committee (PEC) of the ANC that had been held in June 2012. The basis of the application was that there had been irregularities in the branch processes by which branches had elected delegates to the conference.

All 25 members of the Free State PEC and the ANC’s national formation were the respondents in the High Court and the Constitutional Court. The High Court did not reach the merits of the application, but dismissed it on certain procedural grounds:

  • that the applicants should not have published the notice of motion in the press without court authorisation, nor they should they have refused to give people a copy of the papers unless they intended to oppose the application;
  • that at least those branches where there had been irregularities should have been joined;
  • the PEC had not been joined;
  • there had not been proper notice or service, except on one respondent;
  • that the application was premature; and
  • the applicants should have exhausted their internal remedies.

    Yacoob J, writing for the majority held that none of the grounds was sufficient not to hear


    the application:
  • it was not necessary for the applicant to have served on everyone, it was prudent

    of the applicants to have published the notice of motion in t the press and it was


    reasonable to give voluminous papers only to those people who wished to oppose


    the application;
  • there was no need for branches to be joined mainly because no relief had been

    claimed against them;
  • all the notice and service findings were erroneous and were resolved by the fact

    that all the parties had filed papers and 25 respondents were represented in the


    High Court;
  • that the application was not premature in relation to setting aside the PEC

    conference that had taken place before the application was launched; and
  • it was not reasonable to expect the applicants to appeal to the national conference

    of the ANC because that was a conference at which those people that the


    applicants objected to would be present.

The High Court should have considered the case on its merits. Writing for the majority on the merits, Moseneke DCJ and Jafta J held that constitutions and other rules of political parties must be consistent with the Constitution of the Republic (Constitution). They held further that in regulating their internal affairs, political parties must facilitate the exercise of political rights entrenched in section 19 of the Constitution.

The majority found that the appellants proved irregularities in the preparation process leading up to the Provincial Conference. These irregularities, held the majority, amounted to a violation of the appellants’ right to participate in the activities of the ANC and a breach of the ANC’s constitution as well as its Membership Audit Guidelines. As a result the majority held that the irregularities nullified the Provincial Conference. Writing for the minority Froneman J held that although the matter raised a constitutional issue, it was not in the interest of justice to grant leave. In his view the appeal could have been directed to the Full Court of the High Court or the Supreme Court of Appeal. On the merits, Froneman J found that the appellants failed to prove that their grievances were not resolved by the ANC. He held that this was the only case the ANC was expected to meet. For these reasons he would have dismissed the appeal.

Case File including all annexures:-  read online or download from link above :-

Ramakatsa-Case

 

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

ANC Branches take Leadership to court

Branches allege local elections were rigged by the governing party and are taking on the ANC’s top leadership

[et_pb_section transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” custom_padding=”19px|3px|36px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” admin_label=”section” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”18.8906px|0px|0px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

Branches allege local elections were rigged by the governing party and are taking on the ANC’s top leadership

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ custom_padding=”18px|0px|18px|0px” padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]

Fresh after being evicted from the country’s richest metros, the ANC’s top brass face a revolt from branches in its most powerful province.

The revolt is so severe that five KwaZulu-Natal branches – acting on behalf of 40% of the province’s structures – are dragging the party’s national executive committee (NEC) to court to force it to rerun the 2015 provincial leadership conference that saw former premier Senzo Mchunu ousted from power.

In a move that will destabilise the party ahead of its high-stakes elective conference next year, the branches have accused the ANC’s national leadership of endorsing an election that its provincial leadership allegedly rigged.

The ANC and its KwaZulu-Natal leadership have until tomorrow to indicate whether they intend to defend the case.

ANC provincial spokesperson Mdumseni Ntuli said the party would defend the court action.

” THIS COURT ACTION IS A BATTLE BETWEEN TWO CAMPS IN THE ANC. THE FIRST CAMP BELIEVES IN THE ANC’S CORE TRADITIONAL VALUES OF BEING SELFLESS AND BEING ABOUT SERVING COMMUNITIES. THE SECOND GROUPING IS THAT OF POWER… “

“But we have serious issues with the timing of the filing of the court papers. They were filed a few days before the elections. What we can deduce from that is that they were meant to tarnish the image of the provincial executive committee (PEC) and brand it as illegitimate. We all know that the conference and processes leading to it were all above board. As such, we have nothing to fear,” he said.

In papers filed at the High Court in Pietermaritzburg – against 39 respondents, including the national leadership, Premier Willies Mchunu, ANC provincial chairperson Sihle Zikalala, and the Electoral Institute of Southern Africa, which oversaw the voting – they also accuse secretary-general Gwede Mantashe of having a “disgraceful and deplorable” attitude that frustrated their efforts to resolve the matter internally.

Risking expulsion from the party, the branches have asked the court to disband the PEC and set aside the result and decisions of the chaotic November provincial elective conference.

The court action is in open defiance of Luthuli House, which forbids members from taking the party to court and expels them for doing so. But in court papers, the branches argue that they have exhausted all internal party processes, without any joy.

It is also a direct challenge to the ANC’s top-six officials, who endorsed the outcome of the controversial conference.

If the application is successful, it will throw the ANC in the province into disarray as it will render the decisions of the current PEC, and outcomes of meetings they presided over, null and void.

It will force the annulment of the subsequent eThekwini conference that saw incoming Mayor Zandile Gumede take over as chairperson and cancel out big decisions taken by the current PEC, including the removal of the former premier and his MECs.

More importantly, it will have a huge impact on the ANC’s succession, as the Zikalala camp – together with the Premier League (influential supporters of President Jacob Zuma) – is expected to play a key role in supporting whoever Zuma prefers as his successor.

A senior ANC member in KwaZulu-Natal, who spoke on condition of anonymity, alleged the chaotic conference was engineered by the Premier League to consolidate its position ahead of the ANC’s elective conference next year.

“This court action is a battle between two camps in the ANC. The first camp believes in the ANC’s core traditional values of being selfless and being about serving communities. The second grouping is that of powermongers who are bent on enriching themselves, through corrupt patronage networks, to the exclusion of everybody else who is not in their inner circle,” he said.

In court papers, branch leaders and applicants Lawrence Dube, Sibahle Zikalala, Sifiso Mzangwa, Mzweni Ngcobo and Lindiwe Buthelezi allege the party’s NEC gave the “fraudulently predetermined, unconstitutional, invalid, unlawful and irregular” election the thumbs-up. The rebel branches have also asked the court to declare Luthuli House’s decision to “recognise, approve and endorse the conference’s results, resolutions and decisions unlawful and invalid”.

The branches also accuse Mantashe of refusing to speak to a group of lawyers they sent to him to demand answers regarding complaints that aggrieved branches had lodged about the conference.

The court papers contain confirmatory affidavits from 20 other branch leaders around the province and numerous letters of complaint from aggrieved delegates who attended the conference.

“Somewhat disgracefully, the secretary-general’s written response was to advise those attorneys that the ANC does not deal with and reply to attorneys in matters involving its members,” the court papers say.

At the conference, held in Pietermaritzburg, Senzo Mchunu was ousted as chairperson and replaced by Zikalala. The outcome facilitated Senzo Mchunu’s removal as KwaZulu-Natal premier, and a purge of his supporters from the provincial cabinet in May.

“Despite the appeals lodged with Luthuli House, the illegitimate PEC continued to take drastic decisions and was bent on dividing and destroying the movement,” the court papers say. “We also noted a ploy to replace MECs who supported the previous PEC prior to the conference, the plan being to remove … [Premier Senzo] Mchunu, and [MECs] Mike Mabuyakhulu, Cyril Xaba, Ntombikayise Sibhidla-Saphetha, Belinda Scott and Sibongiseni Dhlomo.”

KwaZulu-Natal is the only province in which the ANC’s support has held steady in the face of dramatic erosion elsewhere in the country. The eThekwini council is one of three of the country’s eight metros in which the ANC won an outright majority in the local government elections two weeks ago.

Following the contentious November conference, 266 branches out of just more than 550 that attended lodged complaints with Luthuli House against the new PEC. The province has 836 branches. Letters of complaint submitted with the court application claim that credentials were not adopted, illegitimate delegates were sneaked in, and legitimate ones were disqualified.


In court papers, the branches also allege that:

  • The tweeting of election results by the @myANC Twitter handle while voting was still under way proves the election was rigged and “fraudulently predetermined”;
  • The provincial congress, held six months ahead of time, was irregular and not authorised by a third of the party’s branches in the province, as required by the ANC’s constitution;
  • Many delegates had not been properly elected in branch general meetings, and membership details and figures were manipulated and “cooked”;
  • The voters’ roll was manipulated to favour certain branches, and disadvantage others;
  • Branches were not given sufficient time to query and correct preconference branch audit findings; and
  • The party’s national and provincial leadership failed to timeously respond to complaints and appeals branches raised about problems before the conference.

In court papers, the branch members say the PEC agreed to an early provincial conference so as not to disrupt preparations for the local government elections. They also allege that while the NEC did not sanction the conference in writing, it tacitly approved it by sending ANC national chairperson Baleka Mbete, deputy secretary-general Jessie Duarte and treasurer-general Zweli Mkhize to attend.

The applicants argue that it was strange that the NEC would send representatives to the congress when, 10 days before that, Mantashe had, in writing, instructed the province to postpone the conference. They argue that if the ANC changed its mind, it should have communicated that in writing.

The applicants allege the election results were rigged and “fraudulently predetermined”.

“While the voting process was still proceeding, a tweet from the @myANC account was disseminated purporting to set out the results of voting at the congress as follows: 1 459 delegates voted, Senzo Mchunu received 675 votes, Sihle Zikalala received 789 votes. It also stated ‘Sihle is the chairperson’. That tweet was sent at 10.23pm on November 7.”

The court papers say: “It is unfortunate, but probably no coincidence, how accurately this premature tweet on the official ANC Twitter account predicted the voting for the provincial chairperson. When the result was ultimately announced on November 8, the electoral Institute for Sustainable Democracy confirmed indeed that 1 459 delegates had voted, four ballots had been spoilt, Senzo Mchunu had received 675 votes, and Sihle Zikalala had received the remainder.

“Quite how such an accurate prediction could have been made before voting was even finished is difficult to understand, unless those results were fraudulently predetermined.”

[/et_pb_text][et_pb_blurb title=”View article source” url_new_window=”off” use_icon=”on” font_icon=”” icon_color=”#bf3c00″ use_circle=”off” circle_color=”#00a323″ use_circle_border=”off” circle_border_color=”#00a323″ icon_placement=”top” animation=”top” background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”center” use_icon_font_size=”off” icon_font_size=”36px” admin_label=”Blurb” header_font_size=”22px” body_font=”Droid Sans||||” body_font_size=”14px” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”]cp[/et_pb_blurb][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

Ramakatsa and Others v Magashule and Others (CCT 109/12) – Case File

Free State 2012 –

[et_pb_section transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” admin_label=”section” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on” admin_label=”row” disabled=”off”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ disabled=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_image src=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/pdfdownload-button-1-1.png” show_in_lightbox=”off” url=”http://mybranch.co.za/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/const.pdf” url_new_window=”on” use_overlay=”off” sticky=”on” align=”center” force_fullwidth=”off” always_center_on_mobile=”on” admin_label=”Image” use_border_color=”off” border_color=”#ffffff” border_width=”1px” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off”] [/et_pb_image][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” admin_label=”Text” use_border_color=”off” border_style=”solid” disabled=”off” inline_fonts=”Roboto”]

Date of hearing: 20 November 2012 and 29 November 2012

On Tuesday 18 December 2012, the Constitutional Court gave reasons why, on 21 November 2012 it granted to leave to appeal against a judgment of the Free State High Court. The applicants, six members of the African National Congress (ANC) in the FreeState had asked the High Court, to declare invalid a meeting of the Free State Provincial Executive Committee (PEC) of the ANC that had been held in June 2012. The basis of the application was that there had been irregularities in the branch processes by which branches had elected delegates to the conference.

All 25 members of the Free State PEC and the ANC’s national formation were the respondents in the High Court and the Constitutional Court. The High Court did not reach the merits of the application, but dismissed it on certain procedural grounds:

  • that the applicants should not have published the notice of motion in the press without court authorisation, nor they should they have refused to give people a copy of the papers unless they intended to oppose the application;
  • that at least those branches where there had been irregularities should have been joined;
  • the PEC had not been joined;
  • there had not been proper notice or service, except on one respondent;
  • that the application was premature; and
  • the applicants should have exhausted their internal remedies.

    Yacoob J, writing for the majority held that none of the grounds was sufficient not to hear


    the application:
  • it was not necessary for the applicant to have served on everyone, it was prudent

    of the applicants to have published the notice of motion in t the press and it was


    reasonable to give voluminous papers only to those people who wished to oppose


    the application;
  • there was no need for branches to be joined mainly because no relief had been

    claimed against them;
  • all the notice and service findings were erroneous and were resolved by the fact

    that all the parties had filed papers and 25 respondents were represented in the


    High Court;
  • that the application was not premature in relation to setting aside the PEC

    conference that had taken place before the application was launched; and
  • it was not reasonable to expect the applicants to appeal to the national conference

    of the ANC because that was a conference at which those people that the


    applicants objected to would be present.

The High Court should have considered the case on its merits. Writing for the majority on the merits, Moseneke DCJ and Jafta J held that constitutions and other rules of political parties must be consistent with the Constitution of the Republic (Constitution). They held further that in regulating their internal affairs, political parties must facilitate the exercise of political rights entrenched in section 19 of the Constitution.

The majority found that the appellants proved irregularities in the preparation process leading up to the Provincial Conference. These irregularities, held the majority, amounted to a violation of the appellants’ right to participate in the activities of the ANC and a breach of the ANC’s constitution as well as its Membership Audit Guidelines. As a result the majority held that the irregularities nullified the Provincial Conference. Writing for the minority Froneman J held that although the matter raised a constitutional issue, it was not in the interest of justice to grant leave. In his view the appeal could have been directed to the Full Court of the High Court or the Supreme Court of Appeal. On the merits, Froneman J found that the appellants failed to prove that their grievances were not resolved by the ANC. He held that this was the only case the ANC was expected to meet. For these reasons he would have dismissed the appeal.

Case File including all annexures:-  read online or download from link above :-

Ramakatsa-Case

 

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]

ConCourt reserves judgment in ANC Free State case

[et_pb_section transparent_background=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” inner_shadow=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” padding_mobile=”off” make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” make_equal=”off” use_custom_gutter=”off” fullwidth=”off” specialty=”off” admin_label=”section” disabled=”off”][et_pb_row make_fullwidth=”off” use_custom_width=”off” width_unit=”off” custom_width_px=”1080px” custom_width_percent=”80%” use_custom_gutter=”off” gutter_width=”3″ padding_mobile=”off” allow_player_pause=”off” parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” make_equal=”off” column_padding_mobile=”on” parallax_1=”off” parallax_method_1=”on” parallax_2=”off” parallax_method_2=”on” parallax_3=”off” parallax_method_3=”on” parallax_4=”off” parallax_method_4=”on”][et_pb_column type=”4_4″ parallax=”off” parallax_method=”on” column_padding_mobile=”on”][et_pb_text background_layout=”light” text_orientation=”left” inline_fonts=”Roboto”]

Alleged irregularities ranging from intimidation to register rigging had infected the Free State ANC’s delegate and voting processes from branch level all the way through to its provincial conference in June, the Constitutional Court heard on Thursday.

 Advocate Dali Mpofu, acting for six disgruntled Free State ANC members – and thousands others from branches in the province – who are asking for the court to declare its June provincial conference and “all decisions and/or resolutions adopted there … declared unlawful and set aside” suggested that as many as 400 of the 750 voting delegates at the provincial conference were “tainted” – rendering the outcomes there illegitimate.

 The current Free State provincial executive committee is strongly in favour of returning incumbent president Jacob Zuma for a second term and the Constitutional Court’s judgment – expected before the party goes to Mangaung in December for its elective conference – could impact on whether the province can send members to the conference. It may also impact on whether the ANC decides to postpone its elective conference and on the outcome of who leads the party.

 Currently, Zuma is being challenged by “forces of change” groupings that are calling for him to be replaced by his deputy Kgalema Motlanthe. Motlanthe, who has already been nominated by the ANC Youth league to challenge Zuma, has yet to accept a nomination.

 Those challenging the legality of the province’s provincial executive committee are supportive of a change of ANC leadership.

 Mpofu had claimed that several branches including the Fidel Castro branch, the Batho Pele branch and the Moses Mabhida branch had suffered a litany of irregularities. These included both parties agreeing that the Fidel Castro branch had been unable to audit its membership, yet still sent 10 voting delegates to the Free State provincial conference

 Drawing from correspondence between former provincial secretary Sibongile Besani and the ANC’s national head office, Mpofu pointed out that among others, membership “files were tampered with and fiddled from the outset”; that there was a “developing tendency that gangsters and criminals were being used to intimidate branch members”; that “meetings were manipulated”; and that money was used to influence the process.

 Mpofu said that at some point, Besani, as “chief executive officer of the party at that level” reached a situation where he said “standing where I am, I don’t think this [procedure] is lawful”.

 Mpofu went on to assert that these complaints had not been properly dealt with by ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe. However, Mantashe in an affidavit filed with the court, stated that to his knowledge all the complaints initially raised with the national office had been dealt with and that “the bulk of those” appearing on the founding affidavits when the matter first appeared in the Free State High Court “were raised with the ANC for the first time”.

 In matters where there are a dispute of facts, the court will use the Plascon-Evans rule emanating from a 1984 Supreme Court of Appeal judgment that set a precedent for judges to base decisions on the respondents’ version of facts.

 Mpofu had also contended that the actions of the Free State leadership had infringed on the applicant’s constitutional rights to freedom of political association and to participate in the activities of a political party – as per section 19.1(b) of the Constitution. The application for judicial review of the actions of the dominant ANC faction in the Free State was also brought under the Promotion of Administrative Justice Act.

 Counsel for the Free State ANC’s provincial committee, Willem van der Linde told the court that his clients did not dispute that there were problems with branch processes leading up to the provincial conference but contended that “they were attended to”.

 Justice Zak Yacoob questioned advocate Terry Motau, acting for the ANC, on the vagueness of the party’s submissions with regard to the national office’s interventions over the complaints that disgruntled branches had lodged.

 Yacoob noted that there was “no evidence that specific complaints were addressed … and one doesn’t know what the deployees actually did.”

 Motau was not able to extrapolate on specifics, only to say that of the 60 complaints lodged, the 45 were “addressed”. He noted that Mantashe “took the view that he sufficiently deals with” the question of the probity of the branch processes “through the pre-provincial conference audit and the post-conference audit”.

 This despite reservations from some of the justices, including Yacoob, that the respondents were not providing “complete answers to the detail” that would have burnished the integrity of the ANC’s audit process and interventions.

 Motau had also suggested that the Constitutional Court leave the matter to be dealt with by the ANC in accordance with rule 11.3 of its constitution, which allows for the national conference – which in this case will happen in two weeks’ time – the “right and power to review, ratify, alter or rescind any decision taken by any of the constituent bodies, units or officials of the ANC”.

 Chief Justice Mogoeng Mogoeng however found this “problematic” as it meant people who were “part of the collective to deal with the problem” at Mangaung, also, potentially, constituted part of the problem before the court.

 The Constitutional Court reserved judgment.

 Outside court, meanwhile, groups of Zuma supporters faced off against ANC supporters calling for change. Both groups numbered around 300, singing and hand-signalling people.

 In Sasolburg, the ANC leadership in the Free State was holding its provincial nominations conference to decide on which leaders it would support in Mangaung. 

[/et_pb_text][/et_pb_column][/et_pb_row][/et_pb_section]